Checking that the exclusion worked
Wait for one check to run, then open a report for that day filtered to source senriko-monitor. You should see exactly the number of sessions we say we sent - the figure is on the check card, as submissions per month. If you see more, something else is using the same label. If you see none at all and the check is running, the exclusion is happening at collection time rather than at reporting time, and the next section is what that costs you.
If it goes wrong
Two failures are common and both look like something else. An internal-traffic filter set to Exclude drops the events before they are stored, and no report can bring them back - our conversion monitoring then reads your form as producing nothing at all. And a filter matching the address rather than the domain stops matching the day a check is deleted and set up again, because the address carries the check's own id. Match the domain.
What the check does with them
We know exactly how many submissions we sent, when, and with what label. Comparing that with what your analytics recorded is the one check on conversion tracking that does not depend on your visitors doing anything.
If our submissions stop arriving in your analytics entirely, we do not report your tracking as broken - we mark the check unavailable and say that internal traffic is probably being filtered by IP. The monitor on your site page shows which state it is in.
Keeping them out of your CRM
Analytics is one half. The submissions also arrive as enquiries.
How to filter them in your CRM →